On 12/03/2012 01:24 PM, Tiago Peixoto [via Main discussion list for the
<br/>graph-tool project] wrote:
<br/>&gt; On 12/01/2012 12:54 AM, alepulver wrote:
<br/>&gt; &gt; Does it also happen to you:
<br/>&gt; &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; pos = gt.random_layout(polysemy)
<br/>&gt; &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; print &quot;here&quot;
<br/>&gt; &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; gt.graph_draw(polysemy, pos=pos, output='ejercicio_5_gv.png')
<br/>&gt; This took only about 2 seconds on my machine... I have no idea how it
<br/>&gt; could take two hours.
<br/>&gt;
<br/>I made a mistake. My program was also using &quot;output_size=(10000,
<br/>10000)&quot;. With the default value it takes a few seconds.
<br/><br/>But is it supposed to take so much when increasing output size? The most
<br/>expensive part should be calculating node positions, as you said.
<br/>&gt; &gt; I've attached a screenshot, which shows unused space in the image.
<br/>&gt; &gt;
<br/>&gt; &gt; I would like to separate nodes as much as possible so that edges are
<br/>&gt; &gt; visible, or strech them to fit the picture at least.
<br/>&gt;
<br/>&gt; There is obviously something wrong with the bounding box
<br/>&gt; calculation. I'll take a look into it.
<br/>Thanks.
<br/><br/>Cheers,
<br/>Alejandro
<br/>

	
	
	
<br/><hr align="left" width="300" />
View this message in context: <a href="http://main-discussion-list-for-the-graph-tool-project.982480.n3.nabble.com/Drawing-large-graphs-tp4024845p4024852.html">Re: Drawing large graphs</a><br/>
Sent from the <a href="http://main-discussion-list-for-the-graph-tool-project.982480.n3.nabble.com/">Main discussion list for the graph-tool project mailing list archive</a> at Nabble.com.<br/>