On 13.08.2015 11:28, mh wrote:
> While this one (vertices corresponding to a 4x4x4 repeated hexagonal-close-packed lattice) doesn't work, and the ratio of edges to vertices is 5.625:
>
> g,pos = gt.geometric_graph(points_not_working, 1.00000001,
> [(0, 4.0), (0, 6.9282032302755088), (0, 6.5319726474218083)])

Well, can you pinpoint any of the missing edges? It would be much easier
to debug if the example contained only two points where a missing edge
should have been...

Also, please provide data in a way that is easy to load in a program, at
least with copy and paste. If you do print(array), it is not a good
idea, since one would need to parse it by hand. Instead do
print(repr(array)).

Best,
Tiago

--
Tiago de Paula Peixoto <[hidden email]>


_______________________________________________
graph-tool mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool

signature.asc (836 bytes) Download Attachment

--
Tiago de Paula Peixoto <[hidden email]>

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://main-discussion-list-for-the-graph-tool-project.982480.n3.nabble.com/Geometric-graph-generation-possible-bug-difficult-to-re-produce-tp4026228p4026240.html

To unsubscribe from Geometric graph generation: possible bug, difficult to re-produce, click here.
NAML